It’s a classic business quandary: what separates a manager from a leader? Is every manager a leader? Where do the two overlap? Keep reading to find out!
While it’s been played out many times, the distinction is an important one worth examining closely – especially if you’re in a position of power within your organization.
We all have an idea of what a leader should be. Our minds may jump to iconic examples across history like Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, or Joan of Arc. People who ignite sweeping change, make bold statements, and aren’t afraid to put themselves on the line.
Similarly, we can probably think of plenty of examples of what a leader shouldn’t be or when leadership goes wrong — someone who is controlling, only after their own goals, or lacks empathy and self-awareness, for starters.
We also have our conceptions of what a manager should be – someone who is organized, task-oriented, and focused on the day-to-day business of getting things done. Though, admittedly, the popular-culture examples out there tend to be less inspiring! Think: The Office’s Michael Scott or Office Space’s Bill Lumbergh.
In this post, we’re here to help you:
From there, we’ll look at how you can put this information into practice so that you can effectively guide and motivate your team in today’s workplace with these key distinctions.
As the American naval admiral and pioneering computer scientist Grace Hopper famously said,
“You manage things; you lead people.”
And if we want to put things simply, this cuts to the core difference between leadership and management.
While management is rooted in the processes and practicalities of meeting company objectives, goals, and targets, leadership is concerned with the bigger picture, forward-looking aspects of an organization. Those intangible qualities like inspiration and vision are harder to quantify and are what motivate people to keep working hard and striving towards a shared goal.
If you imagine that your organization is a sailboat, then managers are the crew members constantly adjusting the rigging to ensure that everything moves smoothly ahead. Meanwhile, the leader is the captain with their eyes on the horizon and compass in hand, keeping the whole voyage sailing in the right direction.
The two roles can also be defined through the lens of change management, an essential aspect of any organization. In that case:
Leadership describes the tools people use to create a new future. Leaders guide people from the current state to a new idea or change state. They, quite simply, focus on ‘change’ activities.
Management then describes the tools people use to ensure that the current process or structure delivers expected products. Managers focus on execution or ‘compliance’ activities.
Source | Grace Hopper was a naval officer and early leader in computer programming.
Another key point to note about leadership and management is that managers have an official role within an organization. The role of a manager is multi-faceted and requires a person to juggle many duties and tasks, from budgeting and organizing team members to analyzing and communicating performance results.
Leaders, on the other hand, can be found at any level of the company, not just at the top.
Salespeople at the bottom of the hierarchy can be inspiring leaders in their own right, encouraging their team members to do better through their words or actions. And while good managers act as leaders, not all are.
In short, not all managers are leaders and not all leaders are managers, but both are essential to the success of an organization. The trick is finding the right meshing of the two, whether in one person or between multiple.
Gallup illustrates just how essential each role is to an organization’s success. The company found that managers who are directly supervised by highly engaged leadership teams are 39% more likely to be engaged than managers who are supervised by actively disengaged leadership teams.
What’s more, they found that employees who are supervised by highly engaged managers are 59% more likely to be engaged than those supervised by actively disengaged managers.
This is important because we know that engaged teams drive results, with one study showing that highly engaged business teams increase profitability by 21%.
Now that we have a high-level understanding of a manager vs a leader, let’s unpack the characteristics and responsibilities that define each.
If we follow our sailing analogy from earlier, then the captain, as the leader of the ship and crew, is responsible for charting the best course to reach the desired destination. Come hell or high water, as the saying goes, they must make quick decisions and keep morale high, even, and especially when, things get blown off course.
Riding the seas of change and setting an inspiring example in the process is the job description.
Essentially, effective leaders understand how to rally people around a vision. They generate new ideas and win people over to them by:
Being a leader comes with an array of responsibilities, including:
With such critical duties falling under a leader’s purview, understanding their role begs the question: what makes a good leader? What traits are essential to excel in a leadership role?
First, we should establish that leadership and management do not represent people. They represent skill sets deployed towards either a change or compliance result. And if something is a skill set, then that’s great news because it means that it can be developed, as long as the right mindset is adopted.
When it comes to sales management and leadership, the most effective way to shift your mindset in the long term is by dedicating yourself to training that specializes in behavioral change.
Here are some hallmarks of great leaders:
To hone these traits, it’s important for a leader to understand their leadership style — their unique method and way of directing people — and consider if it is serving them well. While definitions for leadership styles abound, every leader will eventually develop their own style with its own unique mix of elements. Let’s go over a few of the most common styles.
The directive leadership style demands immediate compliance. Its commanding and controlling approach is most effective in a crisis when immediate results are needed.
It’s not uncommon for directive leaders to use threats as a way to force desired behavior. However, this is unlikely to be effective in the long-term for obvious reasons!
A directive leader will say, “Do as I tell you.”
Visionary or transformational leaders, as they are also commonly called, have a clear idea of what the future should look like. They bring their vision to life by:
Visionary leadership is overwhelmingly positive and most effective when direction is required. Leaders who adhere to this style are empathetic, big-picture thinkers who communicate well.
A visionary leader will say, “Come with me.”
Connected leadership favors a people-first approach that focuses on harmony and shies away from confrontation. Connected leaders are good at forming bonds and communicating feedback which:
However, the connected leader’s relentlessly supportive approach can prove detrimental to less driven team members, who would benefit from a style that applies more pressure.
A connected leader will say, “People come first.”
Democratic leadership takes an open, communicative approach that, like connected leadership, creates an open environment and fosters high morale. Democratic leaders empower their team and create buy-in by working collaboratively to make decisions.
However, this collective type of decision-making can be inefficient. This style tends to work best with team members who are more experienced.
A democratic leader will say, “What do you propose?”
Pacesetting leaders set high standards and lead by example. They focus on goals and the speed at which they are achieved.
Pacesetting leadership is a style that garners quick results in a mature team. However, it risks overwhelming less experienced team members who might be tempted to sacrifice the quality of their work to meet a deadline.
A pacesetting leader will say, “Do as I do now.”
Coaching leaders are committed to developing people for the future. They are nurturers – adept at mentoring and bringing out the best in people.
A coaching leadership style is especially beneficial to less experienced team members but does require time and patience. If you’re looking for immediate results, then a different style of leadership may be more effective.
A coaching leader says things like, “What are the options? Which one will work for you?”
Each and every team is different, and the effects of leadership styles on team motivation will be different depending on the requirements and preferences of each team. Leadership agility – having the ability to switch between styles depending on the situation – is a great skill to master.
With that said, one style stands out as being particularly effective: visionary leadership, also known as transformational leadership. In fact, one study found that 72% of managers use a transformational leadership style.
Let’s take a closer look at this style.
Transformational leadership improves team motivation by blurring the boundaries between employee and business. Rooted in the idea of a shared vision, it creates an environment that employees feel they are truly a part of; they see the bigger picture, and they’re motivated to do their best to help the business achieve its goals.
Gartner notes that transformational leadership increases staff motivation, performance, and morale, and studies have found that transformational leadership directly boosts employee motivation.
With leadership clearly defined, we can now examine the qualities and responsibilities of a manager and how they differ from those of a leader.
Just as crew members on a boat need to balance a range of tasks, from mopping down the deck to trimming the sails, similarly, a good manager has to skillfully take on a wide range of duties. All of these duties boil down to one overarching mission: helping people implement accepted ideas and practices to secure results.
Management responsibilities can include:
That may seem like a lot to take in, but it can be simplified to four main areas:
An effective manager controls these four areas through thorough preparation and communication. They share the details of an implementation plan or process design, and each goal, objective, and action item is clearly explained to employees. Finally, they utilize project management tools for clarity on exactly who will do what by when.
Another way to think of it is that managers are more focused on how and when to execute the what and why defined by leaders in the organization.
All great managers share a few principal traits:
Learn more about the skills needed to be a great manager
Just like with leaders, it’s important for managers to also understand their own management style and the management styles available to them. Instead of taking a one-size-fits-all approach, great managers are able to use different styles to face the challenges of the moment.
While it can be easy to declare allegiance to one label or the other, in actuality, the relationship between leadership and management is a delicate dance. The trick is to seamlessly shift between one and the other and recognize when the right set of skills should be deployed.
In most processes, an underlying cycle of leadership and management is at play.
In most cases, the driver is the same person for both processes, although as we mentioned earlier, this isn’t always the case.
Exploring how you behave when in leadership mode or management mode can also shed light on the skills or traits you need to develop for all the situations that are bound to arise. It’s a set of dance steps, and it benefits you to learn and practice until you can dance to almost any music.
Once you understand what’s called of you in leadership and management roles, the next step is ensuring you have the right skills to help you meet the unique leadership and management challenges of today.
21st-century leadership is different from anything that managers have been faced with before. Even prior to the pandemic, Gartner Analyst Mark P McDonald noted that 21st-century leaders must be artists; they must have an ability to adapt rapidly in a world of work where a talent to ‘relate, create, and instigate change’ defined overall success.
Based on this observation, 21st-century leadership is rooted in the ability to:
After doing a skills gap analysis on yourself and your team, you’ll be able to pinpoint exactly where you have opportunities for improvement.
Maybe you’re great at creating long-term strategies and organizational plans, but you struggle with inspiring your employees to get on board. Or perhaps you’re great at energizing your team around company goals but need to improve your ability to execute the more detail-oriented tasks of managing sales pipelines and reporting results.
Once you know what you need to improve, you can seek out help, whether that be through mentorship from a superior, or investing in specialized courses that can help you sharpen your skills and transform your behavior.
At Krauthammer, we specialize in long-lasting behavior change through our six-step Krauthammer methodology that emphasizes “show how” versus “know how.” We believe that the best way to improve your skills is by first adopting the right mindset and then applying learned knowledge through practice.
Leadership and management are inextricably linked. While leadership is the broader practice of defining a vision and direction and then inspiring, influencing, and convincing people to embrace it, management is more concerned with the practical matters of making the vision a reality.
Both are crucial to the success of a company, and anyone in a position of power should ideally be able to transition seamlessly between both skillsets when the moment calls for it.
As the post-pandemic world continues to push the boundaries of work, new managers and leaders should take stock of their unique leadership and management styles as well as where their skills are lacking, making an effort to level up where needed. At the end of the day, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to management and leadership, but effective leaders find their own approach that respects the power and purpose of both.
These new leadership and management challenges may be frustrating to handle all at once.
But they also provide a unique opportunity for you to adapt your leadership approach now to increase the chances of success tomorrow.
We may be living through a highly challenging decade. But at Krauthammer, we strongly believe that leaders can learn from it, grow from it, and use it as a driving force behind their excellence.